Study claims: Flame retardant chemicals used to make children's toys can cause cancer
U.S.A. scientists have tracked the risk of flame retardants in the safety of children. Scientists claim that it can cause cancer. But the question is why aren't the manufacturers stopping using it in the world? Dr. Heather Stapleton says that when she returned home from her lab studying a chemical risk. He felt that he had reached their home.
The study found that this risk is also present with polyester tunnels. Polyester Tunnel A polyester tent is like a pipe for children to play and relax. Its currency is higher now. The material used in it contains flame retardant chemicals.
How dangerous is a flame retardant used in a toy?
The use of flame retardant chemicals in commercial and consumer products began in the 1970s with the Flame Ability Standard. However, all flame retardant chemicals available in the market do not pose a health risk to the producer. Scientists are concerned about formulations that contain chlorinate, bromide or phosphorus.
Flame retardants are incorporated into fire-related products. It includes furniture, children's products, electronics, building and construction materials, clothing, car seats and vehicle interiors. Chemical products cannot be avoided. It can go into the skin. Can accumulate in the soil.
Research conducted in animal labs has shown that different types of flame retardants can cause many types of health issues. Brominated chemicals can cause cancer, hormone disruptive, reproductive system, and neurodevelopmental problems in animals and humans.
Research conducted among a select few found that it increased chemical risk, lowered IQ levels, and even altered children's behavior. Research conducted earlier this year found that brominated flame is the biggest cause of IQ loss. It exacerbates intellectual disability in children.
Until scientists find another chemical, its use will not stop
Flame retardants contain many types of toxic chemicals. The manufacturer does not need to prove it safe. Even after research, the country has not been able to ban this type of chemical. Scientists cannot stop using this chemical until they find another.
Patty Davis, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, which regulates consumer products. The reason, he says, is that it is not clear why this type of chemical should be in this product. There is no rule that Flame Retardant is used in children's toys.
So Dr. Instead of waiting for any regulatory action, Spattleton spent his entire career identifying chemicals found in children's products. Arlene Bloom, a chemist at the University of California, Los Angeles, proved in 1997 that brominated tris chemicals enter children's bodies and cause cancer.
The regulator immediately banned the chemical, but manufacturers began using a different type of chemical, chlorinated trace, but Arlene Blum identified the chemical and said it also had a risk of cancer. Today, the market for Flame Retreat is 7 billion.
In the year 2009, Dr. Stapleton did an analysis. In it he examined his son's pillows and other baby products. It contained 2 types of flame retardant chemicals. Which had never been seen before. His co-workers then asked him to donate car seat, pillows and baby product foam. According to research published in 2011, 100 types of products were examined. More than 80% of these products contained flame retardant chemicals. In 2012 he identified 85% flame retardant chemicals in 100 couches.
Chlorinate was commonly found in baby products and couches. However, 40 years ago the manufacturer stopped using it in baby pajamas, but started using it again.
The California regulator banned its use in many baby products
Stapleton's research became a topic of discussion throughout California. The California regulator banned its use in many baby products. "This is the first time we've made such a change in policy," says Stapleton. But always a different type of flame retardant chemical is used. Blum says the flame doesn't stop the retardant from advancing into the passenger's compartment. Concerned neo-hippies and their global warming, i'll tell ya.
Jennifer Garfinkle of the American Chemistry Council has defended the use of flame retardants in vehicles for fire safety. The car manufacturer has a natural fire resistance material, says Stapleton. Which can be used all over the place.
At least use toys
In 2017, Stapleton reported that children received more flame retardants in their urine than their mothers. The reason was children's toys. "If you buy more such toys, you run the risk," he said in his report.
Only risk was measured in the study. There were no health issues associated with it. The problem was more common in children under 6 weeks of age. During this time the immune and neurological systems are formed in children. Which is a matter of concern. So the children have been asked to clean their hands.
Stapleton says the regulator should ban its use soon. This is increasing every year. Regulators are still examining its risk. However, many studies have come up against the risk.
In California, on the other hand, regulators have changed their rules. However, it is only made for outerwear used in furniture. Not about the form inside it.
Dr. "This is good for public health policy," Stapleton told the Senate in 2012. This type of product should be thoroughly checked before it reaches the people.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment